Which is better.JP,TLW or JP3?

Was it the original DNA manipulated Jurassic Park, the return of inGen in The Lost-World, or just the worth-wild running around frantically Jurassic Park III that captured your imagination.
User avatar
RaptorKid
an egg
Posts: 9
Joined: 18 Feb 2004, 09:51
Contact:

Post by RaptorKid »

I like JP & TLW:JP because they has a same director accept JP3 /biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" />
doesn't have a same director /dry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="<_<" border="0" alt="dry.gif" /> .I hope JPIV is better. /biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" />
User avatar
Mike112
an egg
Posts: 5
Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 18:36
Contact:

Post by Mike112 »

The original Jurassic Park will always be my favorite. I'm just really into the idea of a park full of dinosaurs. And the cast in the movie all play their roles so brilliantly. The Lost World was good, just not as good as the original, but definately a worthy sequel. Jurassic Park 3 was OK at best...not a worthy sequel. Should JP4 be made? Only if it's a prequel to TLW that shows what happened on Site B. That's what I would like.
User avatar
williv
a hatchling
Posts: 51
Joined: 21 Feb 2004, 14:12
Contact:

Post by williv »

Jurassic Park was a pinnacle film that entranced its viewers, while The Lost World was entertaining but not as fresh as the original. Tres was just eye-candy.
User avatar
Rick
a hunter
Posts: 343
Joined: 04 Mar 2003, 23:46
Location: Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by Rick »

Jurassic Park. Why? Because without it, you wouldn't have TLW or JP3... of the latter I could do without, though.
[b]- Rick [/b]

My Xbox 360 Can Blog? Suwheet...
User avatar
Sara
a hunter
Posts: 264
Joined: 09 Oct 2002, 23:27
Gender: Female
Location: Middle TN; USA.
Contact:

Post by Sara »

Alexander wrote:
Samfan wrote: I like JP the best-- everything in it was great (story characters etc), nothing was rushed-- unlike JP3.  I didn't really like TLW because it didn't stick to the novel, plus I was more interested going back to the first island then finding out there was another one  /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
Couldn't have said it better.
/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

[b]You gon' get RAPED. [/b]
User avatar
Kalyber
an egg
Posts: 8
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 02:13
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Post by Kalyber »

JP is the greatest!
TLW is not perfect, but a good one.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
JP3 /wacko.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":wacko:" border="0" alt="wacko.gif" /> /mad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":angry:" border="0" alt="mad.gif" /> /sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":(" border="0" alt="sad.gif" /> no comment
User avatar
Jpfan91989
a hatchling
Posts: 50
Joined: 02 Nov 2003, 18:30
Contact:

Post by Jpfan91989 »

tyrant_lizard_king wrote:How many of you can honestly tell me that if it wasn't for the Special Effects alone, you'd probably wouldn't even be here at this site right know or Hell this site probably wouldn't even exist.
if it wasn't for Michael Crichton there would be no Jurassic Park series. If there was no Jurassic Park series there obviously wouldn't be the FX. We could still be hear if the movie wasn't made or if the efffects were horrible. What about the Crichton fans who know the truth about the Jurassic PArk series? They would surely try to persuade people that there is a strong difference between the books and the movies ((If the first was made into CRAP))?

Jurassic Park
Cast: 4/5 ((They casted Gennaro wrong))
Acting: 4.5/5
FX: 5/5
Story: 5/5
Characters: 4/5 ((poor Gennaro what a wasted character))

The Lost World
Cast: 2/5 ((What can I say they had Julianne Moore play Sarah))
Acting 3/5
FX: 5/5
Story: 3/5 ((nothing compared to book))
Characters: 3/5 ((Where's the best charcters Dodgson and Thorne?))

Jurassic PArk 3
Cast: 2/5 ((Sam Neil brought it up))
ACting: 1/5
FX: Worse than JAWS: The Revenge and that was crap
Story: -5/5 ((nothing good))
Charcters: 2/5 ((Billy was a good addition))
User avatar
tyrant_lizard_king
a hatchling
Posts: 88
Joined: 06 Dec 2003, 16:04
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Post by tyrant_lizard_king »

Oh Wow. The Jurassic Park movie is SO close to the book. MY ASS. They took an awesome novel & completely ruined it. I was expecting Jaws with dinosaurs. Peter Jackson should reamke it. Then we might actually get something. Speilberg's a fu**ing moron. I'll hate Speilberg for eternity for what he did to my dream.
User avatar
Jpfan91989
a hatchling
Posts: 50
Joined: 02 Nov 2003, 18:30
Contact:

Post by Jpfan91989 »

tyrant_lizard_king wrote:Oh Wow. The Jurassic Park movie is SO close to the book. MY ASS. They took an awesome novel & completely ruined it. I was expecting Jaws with dinosaurs. Peter Jackson should reamke it. Then we might actually get something. Speilberg's a fu**ing moron. I'll hate Speilberg for eternity for what he did to my dream.
WHo said the books and movies are close. I believe I said
jpfan9189 wrote:They would surely try to persuade people that there is a strong difference between the books and the movies
No too me that says that the Crichton fans would tell people that the books are better than the movie and there is a huge difference between them.
User avatar
allosaur176
a hatchling
Posts: 40
Joined: 04 Apr 2004, 13:58
Contact:

Post by allosaur176 »

I love them in the order they were made

JP, the best dinosaur movie there will ever be

TLW, a great sequel, very dark

JP3, a cartoon brought to life ( thats all its good for ). a movie where you don't care about the characters,or the non exsistant plot, and is all about the SFX
Post Reply