Jurassic Park db forum

how about this story for a Crichton Cut.

Six years after the death of John Hammond and the mysterious destruction of his Jurassic Park island of Isla Nubla, mathematician Ian Malcolm discovers a second island off Costa Rica, where Hammond created his genetically bred dinosaurs. He travels there with a scientific research team including paleobiologist Richard Levine, Sarah Harding, and two stowaway kids, Kelly and Arby, both 11 years old.

Once on the island, they find themselves on the run for their lives from some of the killer dinosaurs with whom Ian has already crossed paths, along with some new killers. The group not only has to contend with the dinosaurs, but with murderous rival scientist Lewis Dodgson and his cronies, who are out to steal the dinosaur eggs and bring them back to the mainland, as well.

the lost world all over again

Its the true Lost World the movie was trash compared to the novel. Go Crichton.

Jpfan91989 wrote:Its the true Lost World the movie was trash compared to the novel. Go Crichton.

Still, you're just copying the book's plot and trying to claim it'd be a competent fourth film.

That's...what's the word...okay, for some reason South Park's Timmy comes to mind here...

Jpfan91989 wrote:how about this story for a Crichton Cut.

Six years after the death of John Hammond and the mysterious destruction of his Jurassic Park island of Isla Nubla, mathematician Ian Malcolm discovers a second island off Costa Rica, where Hammond created his genetically bred dinosaurs.

Hmm, I've seen this somewhere in a movie before .. oh, I remember now! The Lost World: Jurassic Park.

There is only 1 JP movie in my mind, the original. I would rather see a Lost World where they have like Crichton wrote it. I know people who support this idea because they realized the sequels were a disgrace to the name Crichton

Nagisa wrote:Still, you're just copying the book's plot and trying to claim it'd be a competent fourth film.

Guys, he's not trying to be serious. He's just trying to say that he's dissatisfied with the JP movies and is making a statement along the lines of "there should be another JP movie that's actually based off the book."

Little common sense?

QUOTE Guys, he's not trying to be serious. He's just trying to say that he's dissatisfied with the JP movies and is making a statement along the lines of "there should be another JP movie that's actually based off the book."[/quote]

Oh really? I couldn't tell through all the grammatically-inept whining.

QUOTE Little common sense?[/quote]

Uh-huh...right...um...so we're suddenly stupid because he can't get his point across?

Nagisa wrote:Uh-huh...right...um...so we're suddenly stupid because he can't get his point across?

I don't know what you're problem is. I caught some of his posts and got the point very clearly.

Aquatic_Spinosaurus wrote:I think that as many of the super predators should feature in the film as possible, it would make the film better...the more carnevoirs, the more violence and blood! /biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" />

That is good but then it would be rated R