Jurassic Park db forum

That would just be a repeat of JP3. Why do that? So the rex can get it's sweet "revenge"? There would not be much of a point to do that.

pack raptor wrote:That would just be a repeat of JP3. Why do that? So the rex can get it's sweet "revenge"? There would not be much of a point to do that.

Notice: I said Characardontosaurus, not Tyrannosaurus.

Aquatic_Spinosaurus wrote:Notice: I said Characardontosaurus, not Tyrannosaurus.

It's still a token animal fight for no real reason.

Exactly.

Nagisa wrote:It's still a token animal fight for no real reason.

it's a symbol of my favourite dino killing. And it's many of my friends favourite.

Nagisa wrote:It's still a token animal fight for no real reason.

I still stand by my original statement. The wishes of a tiny handful of people do not magically justify a randomly-placed fight in a movie script.

Finally found a living JP forum! Just a week ago I discovered there was suppose to be a JP4.

I don't know if they can turn JP4 into another Jurassic Park. The last two were pretty bad (though I think JPIII was better than TLW). I can't believe Speilberg was planning SIX!

Maybe what they can do is READ THE BOOKS! There are only two of them, it shouldn't take too long. Michael Crichton should take back the reins. There are still many things in the books the movies haven't covered.

What I personally loved in Jurassic Park was the science. Malcolm's Chaos Theory was like the underlying theme in the first movie. There was even more in the first book, and the second book talked about the Raptors' social behavior (and probably other stuff I've forgotten). Ok, it shouldn't be full of it, but something like the first movie. Those who are interested in dinosaurs want more than just a monster movie.

ChaosTheory wrote:I can't believe Speilberg was planning SIX!

Well, he is a friend of George Lucas, maybe they swap ideas, lol.

Anyways, welcome to JPdb. Sounds like you've been looking for JP fans for a while, it took me ages before I found one. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

[QUOTE](ChaosTheory on 05.30.2004 15:37)
I don't know if they can turn JP4 into another Jurassic Park. The last two were pretty bad (though I think JPIII was better than TLW).

I'm going to have to disagree with you there ChaosTheory. I thought TLW was alot better than JP3, because it gave you a different and more intimidating feel to the JP franchise in TLW. It was dark, rainy, damp, and muddy which was kind of the opposite look and mood of the original Jurassic Park, it had a harder edge than the original. Also, TLW kept you tense the entire time. I kept thinking to myself "what's going to happen next?". Where as in JP3, it was more toned down for the kiddies, and very predictable. JP3 felt like it was rushed and done with half an effort. I think that one of the thing's that hurt it most was that it focused on fast-paced action as the main force behind the film. In JP1 & JP2 there was a balance between suspense, action, and eye candy. Another thing that I didn't like about JP3 was the over-exposure of the predatory dinosaurs. If you see a velociraptor in bright day light for an hour-and-a-half you lose your fear of it. It's no longer mysterious, so you no longer fear it.Any ways, I thought JP3 was an okay film, just not as good as TLW or Jurassic Park.

Um...I think it needs to be much longer than the others. I didn't read all of ya'll's posts but I just wanted to say that.