Why doesn't anyone (seem to) like JP///?

Was it the original DNA manipulated Jurassic Park, the return of inGen in The Lost-World, or just the worth-wild running around frantically Jurassic Park III that captured your imagination.
User avatar
Dino_Slayer
a wonderer
Posts: 367
Joined: 27 Feb 2003, 09:26
Contact:

Post by Dino_Slayer »

JP3 is an entertaining, but a shallow film and doesn't, therefore, hold the candle for the first one, the only reason it should exist. Simple as that.

It's very likely that we'll see JP4 in 3D.
"With all the respect, JPIV, could you please start rolling?"- Dino_Slayer

User avatar
trex kills spino
the extinct
Posts: 767
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 18:16
Location: JB Land
Contact:

Post by trex kills spino »

i think it would be awsome also i read up on it and the 3d is going to be in imax not regular theaters but dont get your hopes up it could be a joke

look out hollywood
User avatar
Rex-Jay
a wonderer
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 03:35
Location: inside Michael Crichton's Sphere
Contact:

Post by Rex-Jay »

TKS, you could be a joke. And I hope you are.
User avatar
dilo_06
a hatchling
Posts: 38
Joined: 20 Jul 2006, 18:52
Location: Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by dilo_06 »

JP3 was just an average film. No offence to Joe Johnston (sp?) but he isnt anywhere near Spielberg, the story isnt even BASED on any of Crichton's novels (maybe a few scenes from the first two books, but nothing really plot-wise), and kids in films = instant lose.
User avatar
lilgamefreek
the extinct
Posts: 817
Joined: 16 Jun 2003, 17:43
Location: Area 51!
Contact:

Post by lilgamefreek »

There were kids in the other two films. Do they=lose?

Zombies. Hilarious
Post Reply