Page 12 of 15

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 02 Feb 2003, 23:21
by Anonymous
First of all, yes people have tried to find remains, but not much of them have actually been trained professionals. Hence, I said “serious work”. They were rather all amateurs on the subject, like you. <br /><br />The molded imprint just came recently, and it was also discovered by amateurs not far from where I live now. Sure, there are plenty of amateurs, just no real scientists. <br /><br />The population count is the first credible figure which has been put together by a scientific organization (Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization). A figure of 2000-6000 would not exceed the reasonableness threshold, but it is well above the minimum breeding population figure. Bigfoot's have to be extremely rare, which would explain why there isn't many credible eyewitness reports. They don't just hide constantly in fear of being spotted you know. The idea that they bury there dead is not as far-fetched as you seem to think it is, and being primates they naturally have long life spans. Although, they would most likely die at a ripened age of 30 do to numerous parasitic infections and so forth.<br /><br />You obviously lack any sort of comprehending and arguing skills, as you couldn't even come up with single reason as to why you thought my posts was idiot. You seem to think there are tons and tons of people out there trying to find bigfoot, but your wrong. It all costs money, like for proper equipment and funding and unfortunately not many people are willing to invest there money in finding bigfoot. Especially scientists. The chances of success are very slim after all. <br /><br />The bigfoot's intelligence is thought to equal or surpass those of most primates. And like I said, most people (meaning your average Joe, a.k.a. camper) are not out there to capture bigfoot on film. And when they do it usually isn't the best of quality, considering the fact that they are not trained photographers. You do realize the fact that most photos and live footage of bigfoot are captured by armatures, right? Maybe not, as your obviously very uninformed.<br /><br />You really need to be updated on current scientific evidence before you even try to argue with me. Unfortunately, Your just out of my league buddy.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 06 Feb 2003, 21:08
by Anonymous
[quote author=G-rex link=board=35;threadid=701;start=105#msg15363 date=1044242510]<br /><br />---[note: I have eliminated approximately five paragraphs of text that comes across as techno-babblr with a &quot;I know about bigfoot&quot; flavor]---<br /><br />You really need to be updated on current scientific evidence before you even try to argue with me. Unfortunately, Your just out of my league buddy. <br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />Rex, let me tell you a little story about my nephew. He just entered teh second grade and is now continuing her state-mandated curriculum for telling time on an anolog clock. Since fractions aren't introduced into the curriculum until the end of the second grade, she isn;t expected to know what &quot;quater past the hour&quot; means; she has a very vauge idea of what a qyarter is; aside from being the cost of a video game and the biggest coin in his piggy bank. Therefore, we refer the the hands of the clock as &quot;big hand&quot; and &quot;little hand,&quot; and &quot;fast hand.&quot;<br /><br />Here's another story: My little cousin, a third grader, is starting his science curriculum. He was told that even though the world is spinning, we won't fly off because of a little thing called &quot;gravity.&quot; This tells him say &quot;really big things want really small things to stick to them.&quot; Now the particle physicists at Stanford and Berkeley would surely discount this answer on a midterm. But, coming from an 8 year old, I think they would be prone to say &quot;Yeah, that's a pretty good answer.&quot;<br /><br />So instead of trying to discredit your little queries, I'll simply leave you with something my nephew and cousin might say: &quot;Shove off, poopie head.&quot; Now go write, &quot; I will not be a pompous, elitist asshole&quot; 50 times on the blackboard.<br /><br />Sincerely, Rob &quot;I-like-big-butts&quot; Villarreal.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 19 Feb 2003, 23:39
by Anonymous
man, people who cant accept anything but what they know, though the recordings sound fake, I have to give the Big Big Foot Believer Club the one-up in this match, next.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 28 May 2003, 21:49
by Anonymous
i bet something has to do with huge hermits that live in the moutainuos regions. You don't believe me fine, but it's a possiblity that should be taken into consideration

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 01 Jun 2003, 14:22
by lord_w_pizzaball
Hey, maybe its just a bear goddamit :-

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 03 Jun 2003, 16:42
by Anonymous
that too, kodeak bears can be a massive 12 feet high when standing. But then again, this animal might be able to turn invisable like that Tv series on SCIFI. Can't remember what it is..... anyway, maybe they can turn colors much like a squid or octapus does. It might have the most highly evolved cromatifores of any animal alive

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 03 Jun 2003, 17:50
by ChristinaGrant
My uncle Mike and some friends were out camping one night and they heard a squealing and growling that didn't sound like any human and then they heard something BIG crashing through the brush. I wasn't there so I don't know but my uncle's friend had a pic that he gave my uncle that looked very convincing. My uncle is not one to b.s. you on stuff like that since they do go camping alot. I think they could hide in the brush or down some of those canyon like things for years and never be discovered. Maybe they're scared of us like we are of them and maybe they stay away so they won't be poked and prodded by scientists. After all, the Coelocanth was thought to be extinct.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 03 Jun 2003, 23:06
by Anonymous
Well if it is that intellgent to take notice of the destruction we cause, it must have its own lauguage. because something that big can't hide forever on land. The sea however...that's a diffirent story. maybe they made an underwater colony. there are some caves underwater that haven't gotten water in the you know, like a beaver den. There are so mnay possibleities<br /><br />And humans can make unhuman like sounds and clicks, maybe it was just a goof set up by some teenager, a bear, bigfoot himself or it might be something else that is more shrouded in mystery that sasquache. Now THAT is scary

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 04 Jun 2003, 13:57
by lord_w_pizzaball
Maybe it was a radio with low batteries :

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 05 Jun 2003, 19:52
by Anonymous
that would do it