Page 3 of 7

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 17 Oct 2003, 22:53
by the ARK
*Murders Horner*

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 18 Oct 2003, 05:34
by brettwalker
Okay, there's only two possible explanations for this.

1. Lizard People
2. (most likely) Horner is being a dick i.e. "JP is soooo scientifically impossible, I wouldn't be surprised if they had lizard people.

Cue *Murders Horner*

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 18 Oct 2003, 15:33
by lord_w_pizzaball
I have my own reasons to hate that man...

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 23 Oct 2003, 04:29
by OneWingSephiroth
Well, if they start having lizard people running around in JPIV, I'm going to snap at the movie theatres...funny thing is, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Horner was the person who thought of the idea.

His saying would be "Well, we found this piece of old rock...it seems about 67million yrs old, I don't even know if it's a bone...but I believe this belonged to a lizard man species...yes, they grew about 8ft tall and had fangs...where am I getting all this information...why from this piece of stone that might now even be bone fragment...infact, it isn't at all."

You see, after JPIII, I've lost alot of respect, even though I didn't like his "T-Rex theories" the fact of what he states in JPIII in the making of JPIII just made me lose everything...unless Horner owns up to his mistakes, I will not relinquish that he is a paleontologist, they are supposed to find the most accurate truth in dinosauria, not some personal imagination.

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 23 Oct 2003, 19:40
by Tyrannis
If there are Lizardmen I will beat the crap out Horner cover him in gas then light him on fire then burn every copy of the movie in a public bonfire in the center of hollywood

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 23 Oct 2003, 20:43
by Alexander
</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="85%" align="center"><tr><td><font class="small">Quoting :</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" border="0" background="#111111" bgcolor="#111111" width="100%"><tr><td><table cellpading="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"><tr><td class="darktable"><font class="small">If there are Lizardmen I will beat the crap out Horner cover him in gas then light him on fire then burn every copy of the movie in a public bonfire in the center of hollywood </td></tr></table></td></tr></table></td></tr></table><font class="post">

That sums up my feelings.

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 24 Oct 2003, 16:42
by AlphaRaptor^2003
i was looking for stuff on the internet about JP4 and i found this interview with Jack Horner in it at this website...
http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?i...l/45-horner.inc


as i was reading that i found a certain part....
"After hearing the future paleontologists' hypotheses, Horner explained that the real T. rex only looked like the one in Jurassic Park, but acted nothing like it. The real T. rex couldn't run or kill anything, he said, due to its leg and arm structure. But it had a nose that could smell dead meat from 20 miles away, he said."

all i can say to that is...No way...how could a Tyrannosaurus Rex NOT have the ability to kill something??? Jack Horner's a retard...

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 25 Oct 2003, 01:21
by Paleogirl2003
They should get Dr. John Ostrom to give some input, I mean, he's the one who discovered Deinonychus (what JP calls "velociraptor") anyway.

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 26 Oct 2003, 02:01
by AlphaChaosRaptor
oo..very nice choice. /biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" />

Jack Horner talks JPIV!

Posted: 26 Oct 2003, 08:53
by Chaotic_Baryonyx
</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="85%" align="center"><tr><td><font class="small">Quoting :</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" border="0" background="#111111" bgcolor="#111111" width="100%"><tr><td><table cellpading="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"><tr><td class="darktable"><font class="small">Jack Horner is a paleontologist that is convinced Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger, but his reasoning for Spinosaurus not being a scavenger, according to him, is "because it is big."

Sort of frelled logic there. He has excellent hadrosaurid theories though. </td></tr></table></td></tr></table></td></tr></table><font class="post">

</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="85%" align="center"><tr><td><font class="small">Quoting :</font><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" border="0" background="#111111" bgcolor="#111111" width="100%"><tr><td><table cellpading="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"><tr><td class="darktable"><font class="small">Horner shouldn't be included as much on this one or they should get another paleontologist to consult with. It was his bright idea to okay the use of teeth within the Pteranodons. Just my two cents anyways... </td></tr></table></td></tr></table></td></tr></table><font class="post">

And how do you know those were his ideas?

Well, it seems he's indeed still certain that Spinosaurus was the biggest meat-eating dinosaur. But where on earth did you get the 'fact' that his reasoning behind that was it's size?