Jurassic Park db forum

Now that's an entirely different story. It's even more controversial than animal testing.

*blush* lol, I know, but I couldn't think of anything else to say. And you're right there too. It's wrong.
Unles you can come up with making 'artifical human clones' or something... /unsure.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":unsure:" border="0" alt="unsure.gif" />

Why not just test it on live tissue samples? I's the same thing and doesn't endanger a whole being.

HEY! Thats the best idea I've heard of! /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Hm, so far, I cant see any problems with it... yet

There has been dino D.N.A found. A couple years ago they found a feather preserved in amber intact and with D.N.A. From a feathered Dinosaur obviousily LOL.

How do you MAKE a living tissue sample? Would it be like a similar process to cloning? And besides, you'd have to somehow stop the cell from mitosis... I mean, or else you're gonna end up with something thats alien to us and grows...

hmm, alien dino... bad idea. but it could be fixed couldnt it? nowerdays people can just alter the DNA and get rid of it, yes? /dry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="<_<" border="0" alt="dry.gif" /> probably just me with wrong info...

nissin wrote:How do you MAKE a living tissue sample? Would it be like a similar process to cloning? And besides, you'd have to somehow stop the cell from mitosis... I mean, or else you're gonna end up with something thats alien to us and grows...

That, my friend, is the next challenge for science. /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />

It could be simply grown. They have isolated young heart cells before and still made them work, so I think it is possible to make living tissue.

Well, thats one tough cookie , but it SHOULD still, SOMEHOW , be possible, right?

There's always a possibility for anything.

(Bumping these threads to bring back the SCIENCE in this forum.)