Page 5 of 12
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 16:36
by ChanceKell
...You DO realize that this board is for a fanbase from the movies, right?
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 16:41
by Jpfan91989
Yes, I originally liked all of the movies but then I started to read Crichton's books and realized all the mvies save for the first were pure filth
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 17:06
by ChanceKell
Yet you just posted that the first JP movie was filth.. Okay...
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 17:24
by Jpfan91989
no I said the movies save or except for the first one were pure filth
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 20:31
by ChanceKell
ChanceKell wrote:I actually thought that the movie was a pretty good adaptation of the novel, and an excellent example of adapting books to film.
Jpfan91989 wrote:Don't even compare that filth to the book.
Jpfan91989 wrote:[no I said the movies save or except for the first one were pure filth
Sure about that?
Posted: 23 Apr 2004, 20:39
by Jpfan91989
Jpfan91989 wrote:Yes, I originally liked all of the movies but then I started to read Crichton's books and realized all the mvies save for the first were pure filth
That was the post I was refferring to.
Posted: 25 Apr 2004, 09:29
by allosaur176
i can hardly agree that the JP films are what you call "filth"
I loved the books, and i loved the movies
I can agree that alot of JP3 was "filth", but there are afew little things that makes it worth watching
Posted: 25 Apr 2004, 16:06
by Dino_Filip
TLW and Jurassic park is the best out of this three...
Why don't spielberg as a director for the JP///
Posted: 14 Jun 2004, 14:58
by indoraptor
Because It was cmpletely STUPID!!!!! They lyed. T-rex could kick spino ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: 14 Jun 2004, 18:36
by pack raptor
Great argument Indoraptor! I like the fact that you put so much thought into that statement!