Page 6 of 15

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 13 Jan 2003, 23:49
by Alexander
[quote author=sPitter of the Rats link=board=2;threadid=701;start=45#msg12189 date=1042515833]<br />What if the extraterrestrials<br />were really intraterrstrials<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />The leader is named LORD KIMBO*!<br /><br /><br />Anyway, horray for sPitter's creative song-writing mind! <br /><br /><br />*only X-Files fans will know what I am referring to

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 13 Jan 2003, 23:54
by sPitter of the Rats
Surely you didn't think drawing Action figures was my only skill?

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 13 Jan 2003, 23:55
by RobertMuldooJP
[quote author=Roque link=board=2;threadid=701;start=45#msg12188 date=1042515522]<br />[quote author=RobertMuldooJP link=board=2;threadid=701;start=30#msg12180 date=1042513776]<br />poppycock and balderdash! It was a hoax<br /><br />AND how could a 'primate' live underground? No sunlight mind you, rickets galore, simply not possible.<br /><br />Why even discuss such rumors? There is no way to prove/disprove it (much like evolution) so why even bother? I doubt anyone will be able to change my opinion, and I doubt that I would be able to change any of yours.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />You do know that their are life forms that live below the surface, and fish that live thousands of feet under the ocean without sunlight, right? You really don't know anything about this subject, do you?<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />Pitiful insults will not deter me<br /><br />I repeat: &quot;Why even discuss such rumors? There is no way to prove/disprove it (much like evolution) so why even bother? I doubt anyone will be able to change my opinion, and I doubt that I would be able to change any of yours.&quot;<br /><br />see right there, you don’t know how to debate. A TRUE debate...the wholesome thing that it is, is defined as a calm discussion where two people/or teams discuss a topic by weighing out the pros and cons. NO mud slinging or insults of the person or person's opinion is tolerated; the moderator would end the debate and you would lose. A debate is usually used as a discussion of interpretation and opinions of fact or political issues where there is no fact. You cannot have a debate on evolution or ‘big foot’ because there is no proof that it exists, no way to argue a true point * goes off on a tangent *

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 08:46
by andy lives
*SNAP SNAP SNAP SNAP SNAP!*<br /><br />Truly entertaining, sPitz.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 16:15
by Roque
I wouldn't call it an insult at all, more of a fact. You think creatures can't live without light, you're wrong. It's as simple as that.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 17:28
by RobertMuldooJP
I never said creatures cant live without light.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 18:49
by Roque
..

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 18:55
by RobertMuldooJP
no....it is not. I said Primates, not creatures. Creatures implies many living organisms.<br /><br />all known primates must have the sun to survive.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 18:57
by Alexander
Not if primates lived underground for a course of many generations, they'd most likely adapt to the conditions.

Re:Bigfoot?

Posted: 14 Jan 2003, 18:57
by Oviraptor
Click here to listen to Bigfoot,<br /><br />http://www.bfro.net/avevid/sierrasounds ... rdings.mp3